Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Weinstein" Results 21 - 40 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
Kerr says that Weinstein's ruling---insofar as it anticipates that the Supreme Court would overrule an old decision based on the rationales of newer cases---violates the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 4:43 am by SHG
Under New York law, this is set forth in a 1901 decision, People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, a federal court quashed non-party subpoenas served on community activists in connection with a developer's civil rights lawsuit against an upstate New York community.The case is Bloomingburg Jewish Center v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:43 am by Andrew Vey
Perhaps if enough people were moved within the workplace a separate office might have been found for T.L.K. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Josh Sturtevant
If Moore is entitled to the money he should get it, and the Weinsteins shouldn't be able to cheat people. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:53 pm by Evan Schwartz
  For example, the California Supreme Court ruled in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corp. v. [read post]