Search for: "The People v. Watkins"
Results 101 - 120
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
PatLit announces a talk next Tuesday by Latham & Watkins' Don McCombie on what Europe's new patent regime means for junior practitioners, this talk for IPSoc has been arranged on the back of Don's Brave New World series of posts for that weblog. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:56 pm
People must come to IRH knowing what their case is and ready to record what the issues are at FH. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
He was disciplined for violating prison rules against trading and trafficking.In Watkins v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:35 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:00 am
Judge Weill's opinion last week in Eaton v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
It is much easier for the prosecutor to introduce such evidence in an sexual assault trial.In the People v Watkins case, the Michigan Supreme Court, recognizing the irresolvable conflict between the evidentiary rule and the statute, held that the statute controls. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Watkins and reversed People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:45 am
Last December, I wrote a post about AvidAir Helicopter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Watkins decision in 1961. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Maples v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 pm
Pullen, Case No. 142751 and People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:27 am
The plaintiffs in the Bailey v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 2701(April, 2010) Lucas Watkins, How states can protect their policies in Federal Class Actions, 32 Campbell L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 2701(April, 2010) Lucas Watkins, How states can protect their policies in Federal Class Actions, 32 Campbell L. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Edwards v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It happened again last week in Compere v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
That was the focus of the 2nd District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
