Search for: "Thomas Payne" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote an opinion concurring in the decision; Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
In re Vernon Payne and Evla Payne Irrevocable Trust (Parkevich v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
A likelihood of confusion between similar marks is not determined on whether people will be confused between the marks, but rather whether the marks will confuse people into believing that the marks’ goods or services derive from the same origin or sponsorship: Paula Payne Prods. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am by David Markus
Cir. 2014) (member of unanimous majority) (reinstating ex post facto challenge to parole guidelines); Payne v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 8:12 am by Dan Bressler
Magistrate Judge Roy Payne dismissed them before he took any action, the stock ownership would have required Gilstrap’s recusal. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Collins, 506 U.S. 461, 500 (1993) (Thomas, J., concurring).)The tension between Lockett and Jurek was not fully resolved for many years. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
” [emphasis in original text] In recent remarks, Thomas C. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:45 am by Steve Hall
Three inmates — Donald Paradis, Thomas Gibson and Charles Fain — have been freed because of new evidence. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:53 am
The concept of the protection of free speech - especially anonymous speech - traces its roots back to Thomas Payne's pamphlet Common Sense.(1) First published in 1776, it anonymously challenged the authority of Great Britain in the New World and is widely regarded as the first work to ask openly for independence for the Colonies from Britain. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that “if a prediction in Justice Clarence Thomas’s partial dissent proves accurate, caveats in the majority opinion may seriously undermine the ostensible liberal victory. [read post]