Search for: "Thomas v. Department of Corrections (2000)"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Thomas C. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
Justice Thomas is the only Katz dissenter still on the Court. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Using HGN scores alone resulted in 100% classification of BAC >.10% and 90% correct classification below .10%. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
Instead, the initial question on the merits is whether, notwithstanding the absence of any such legal duty, the state nevertheless imposes “substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs," Thomas v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:12 pm
The Court’s decision in FDA v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
” The amount of the tax is $2000 per year for 30 fewer than the total number of the employer’s full-time employees. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:26 am
Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 618 (2000)). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Finally, TRCP's claims based on the Bureau's alleged non-enforcement of the 2000 Record of Decision were moot. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
Further discussion of the desirability (or otherwise) of abolishing appeals to the Privy Council arose: in 1978 in the Report of the Royal Commission on the Courts; in 1989 in a Law Commission Paper on the Structure of the Courts; in 1995 in a report by the Solicitor General to the Cabinet Strategy Committee on court structures; in a Discussion Paper called “Reshaping New Zealand’s Appeal Structure” issued in 2000 by the Attorney General; and in an Advisory Group report in… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:33 pm
First, in Pereira v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Maraist & Thomas C. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 24, 2008 Thomas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
