Search for: "Thomas v. Doe et al" Results 61 - 80 of 667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
The Supreme Court has issued an opinion in BELL ATLANTIC CORP. et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:54 am
REES, COMMISSIONER,KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OFCORRECTIONS, ET AL. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:08 am
ACE Limited et al (May 7, 2009 Supreme Court of Ohio) In a 4-2 decision, the Supreme Court of Ohio reversed the Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, and found that a joint venture agreement between a title reinsurer and several title agencies does not comply with the Ohio Statute of Frauds and, as a result, imposed no fiduciary duties upon the parties. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Guidelines used to determine if an entity is a “public body that is performing a governmental function” for the purposes of the Open Meetings LawThomas, et al. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 06989, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed an order and judgment handed down by Supreme Court, New York County, granting a petition filed by Michael P. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Co., and Nationwide, et al., March Term 2010, No. 03050 (Phila. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Employee entitled to go for a cancer-screening examination without loss of pay or charge to leave accruals Moran v City of Saratoga Springs, et al, 21 Misc 3d 195 In Cruz et al v Wappingers CSD, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Judge James V. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Venkat
Domino's Pizza, Inc., et al., for a similar result under state law in a text spam case brought in Washington.) [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Beth Graham
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133, (June 20, 2013). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:41 am
S., at 938); see also Brief for Respondent Planned Parenthood et al. in No. 05.1382, at 12 (same). [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
Genentech, Inc., et al., which the Supreme Court just decided today:No. 05-608. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Mosey et al. (05-1330) - February 9, 2007Dippin' Dots (DDI) sued Thomas Mosey and other defendants for infringing US Patent 5,126,156, titled "Method of preparing and storing a free flowing, frozen alimentary dairy product". [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:13 am by Steven Cohen
Fire Systems of Michigan, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Michigan – July 31st, 2019) involves a fire that occurred at a hotel. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Mohammed et al, issued three orders that relate to secrecy in the military commissions. [read post]
Moody et al., 34 F.4th 1196 (11th Cir. 2022) that a Florida law prohibiting online services from moderating content by political candidates or “journalistic enterprises” violates the First Amendment. [read post]