Search for: "Thomas v. Rutledge"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 11:52 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:10 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Scott Mange and Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:05 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
Rutledge seemed to admit to factoring in FDR's thinking in Rutledge's own deliberations. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 8:23 pm
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:59 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Magliocca's Prawfsblawg post focuses on the Supreme Court's 1947 decision in Kotch v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:43 pm
Crow also bought three properties belonging to Thomas worth over $100,000 that Thomas never disclosed. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 4:10 am
[Thank to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:39 am
[Thanks to Thomas Rutledge for the lead.] [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
” Levi Lincoln of Massachusetts had served as Thomas Jefferson’s attorney general and was acting in that capacity when he distributed the commission papers that were a major part of the court’s Marbury v. [read post]