Search for: "Thompson v. Department of Correction Records Department" Results 1 - 20 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
 People v Cotton, 242 AD2d 638 [1997].The Seond Department reversed another conviction in People v Spann, where the evidence did not clearly establish the particular location of a gun. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:53 am
Therefore, the trial court erred in admitting the printout from the Department of Corrections' website under the business record exception to the rule against hearsay.Whitley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Beam dissented in part: A correct evaluation of the record, in my view, compels a finding that the department’s actions would deter a person of ordinary firmness from engaging in protected political speech. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
As for the bottom line, it seems quite likely that the committee is correct that, as a legal matter, it is entitled to most of the information and testimony it seeks. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
Arizona Department of Corrections director Charles Ryan may have lost his recurring role with the expected dismissal of Ryan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm by Peter Thompson & Associates
Over the last five years, approximately 1,320 claims have been made against the Maine State Department of Corrections. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:33 pm by Jon Gelman
Defense firm litigation tactics that that are excessive, and counter to the legislative intent of the Workers’ Compensation Act, should be discouraged.Tordaro v Gloucester County Department of Corrections, A-0204-14T2, 215 WL 995827, (N.J. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Not only did Judge Karofsky sentence him to incarceration, Wisconsin Department of Correction's offender movement records indicate that the offender has been in DOC custody since March 2017 through the present. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person… [read post]