Search for: "Thorpe v. Thorpe" Results 41 - 60 of 223
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2023, 9:57 am by Howard Bashman
And Lawrence Hurley and Frank Thorp V of NBC News report that “Democrats’ plan to issue subpoenas in Supreme Court ethics probe hits roadblock; The Democratic-led panel abruptly adjourned before a vote on subpoenas for Republican donor Harlan Crow and conservative legal activist Leonard Leo. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
. #1 1491s v. #9 Cobell settlement beneficiaries The 1491s love Jim Thorpe (I think) but not his captor, winning with 93 percent of the vote. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Borough of Jim Thorpe (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act) on 6/2/15.U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:39 am
Family Law Week has published two judgments in the case of N v N, which went before the Court of Appeal at the end of June. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm by Walter Olson
In November I wrote in Jurist on a Third Circuit panel’s refusal to order that sports great Jim Thorpe be disinterred and reburied under provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); in response, Elizabeth Varner, Diane Penneys Edelman and Leila Amineddoleh of the Lawyers’ Committee for Cultural Heritage Preservation argue that the panel could have based its result on specific language in the statute rather than via the roundabout path it did… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:32 am
In AJ v JJ & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1448 the court was required to deal with the situation where the children wished to have their views heard in an abduction case.Lord Justice ThorpeThe Facts: As Lord Justice Thorpe said giving the leading judgment, on the face of it this was a paradigm case for a return order. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
As a general matter, course of performance evidence is admissible to interpret insurance policies, explained California’s Appellate Court in Employers Reinsurance Company v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 6:34 pm
In re Marosi, 710 F.2s 799, 803, 218 USPQ 289, 292-93 (Fed.Cir.1983); Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]