Search for: "Tibbetts v. Tibbetts"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
An employer may seek summary judgment in human rights action by offering a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason rebutting allegations of unlawful discrimination Tibbetts v Pelham Union Free School Dist., 2016 NY Slip Op 06699, Appellate Division, Second Department§296(1)(a) of the New York State Human Rights Law provides that "[i]t shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 10:00 pm
They usually appear pro se, but Tibbetts v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:10 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:15 am
In Tibbetts v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:30 pm
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
., Appellants, v Andrew M. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 12:08 am
Now comes the first crack in the wall.And who better to explain the implications of the Big E decision than our own appellate superstar Dan Tibbett: Having spent a little time digesting Erlinger v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
Further, said the court, a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms", citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344 and other decisions. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
Further, said the court, a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms", citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344 and other decisions. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, the Appellate Division observed that whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement "is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:10 pm
” Raymond Tibbetts v. [read post]
6 Jul 2008, 1:13 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also, McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision is… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
