Search for: "Tibbetts v. Tibbetts" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Retired administrators [Plaintiffs] who were employed by Niagara Falls City School District alleged that the School District was in breach of contract with respect to its providing health insurance to these retirees.The Appellate Division noted that the parties did not dispute that the language at issue in the various CBAs is unambiguous and, at oral argument, the School District had conceded that this case is controlled by Kolbe v Tibbetts (22 NY3d 344). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d at page 353, the Appellate Division noted that CBA language in Kolbe provided for retiree benefits "that continued beyond the expiration of the CBA", explaining that the relevant language in the Kolbe CBA provided that "[t]he coverage provided [in retirement] shall be the coverage which is in effect for the unit at such time as the employee retires". [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:52 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Retirees had vested health insurance rights that could not be abrogated by successor collective bargaining agreementKolbe v Tibbetts. 2013 NY Slip Op 08290, Court of AppealsFour former non-instructional employees of the Newfane Central School District retired between 2003 and 2008. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Thus, the reimbursements were "retiree health insurance benefits that were voluntarily conferredas a matter of school district policy" (Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344, 358). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Kolbe v Tibbetts, we left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Kolbe v Tibbetts, we left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]