Search for: "Tiffany v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:41 pm
No. 3376197; it’s been on the books in the United States since January 2008, with a claimed priority date of March 8, 2006. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(PatLit) UK Supreme Court – The final battle in Star Wars copyright dispute (IP Osgoode) United States US Patent Reform The time for global harmonisation is now: so says David Kappos, Director of the USPTO (IPKat) Kappos seeks to fight patent reform opposition with facts (IAM) Why the Americans should leave Europe out of their first-to-invent debate – UPDATED (IAM) House debates patent reform – H. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
The case, Brad & Tiffany Kelly v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:24 am
The case, Brad & Tiffany Kelly v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Georgia United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
Judge Gregory of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of Tiffany Mosby-Grant, a female police recruit, against the city of Hagerstown, Maryland and its police department in a sexual harassment case, reversing the district court’s summary judgment ruling. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
Trademark * Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc, 2010 WL 3416635 (U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am
Yes (Michael Geist) Liberals preparing C-32 amendments on digital locks & fair dealing (Michael Geist) UBC launches license database as Access Copyright Agreement nears expiry (Michael Geist) Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore on how copyright can treat consumers unfairly (Michael Geist) Quebec National Assembly passes motion criticizing C-32 (Michael Geist) Separating copyright facts from fiction ahead of legislative hearings (Michael Geist) China Microsoft win in China over pirated… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
It has hundreds of thousands of customers in the state and earns millions of dollars in revenue from the state each year. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
On August 27, 2010, Tiffany (NJ) Inc., and Tiffany & Co. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari appealing the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:56 pm
Does 1 (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions Google gets good results in three adwords trademark cases: Jurin, Flowbee, Dazzlesmile (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court dismisses Tiffany’s final claim against eBay: Tiffany (NJ) Inc. and Tiffany and Company v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
(Michael Geist) United States US General Motorola and Huawei lawsuit re trade secret theft (Tangible IP) US Patents Is it ‘spare time’ if your employer owns your work? [read post]
