Search for: "Tompkins v. Tompkins"
Results 81 - 100
of 351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Tompkins. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
Tompkins, 304 U. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:30 pm
§ 2244(b)(3)(A)—in Tompkins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:52 am
Fact: This case (Tompkins-Holmes v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 12:54 pm
Contrast the reasoning and result in this case with Tompkins v. 23andMe and Nguyen v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
.* In Currier v Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga BOCES, 80 AD2d 979, the Appellate Division ruled that the reassignment of the work of the incumbent of an abolished position among five other (retained) employees, none being assigned more than 50% of the duties of the abolished position, was lawful.** Petitioner was reinstated as Director of Athletics, Physical Education, Health and Chairperson District-wide Health and Safety Team from the relevant preferred eligible list effective August 31, … [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
Swift whose validity after Tompkins v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
Towing Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
Mar. 30, 2017) Tompkins v. 23andMe, Inc. 840 F.3d 1016 (9th.Cir.2016) Ingalls v Spotify USA, Inc 2016 WL 6679561 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:21 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).] [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:37 am
Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
§413-a(c) In Tompkins Cty. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
However, termination of employment under Civil Service Law §71 does not necessarily involve a termination of benefits awarded pursuit to General Municipal Law §207-c, as such benefits 'are a property interest that may not be terminated without procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment' (Matter of Gamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14, 16; see Matter of Uniform Firefighters of Cohoes, Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO v City of Cohoes, 94 NY2d 686, 691; Matter of Meehan… [read post]
