Search for: "Torres v. Thompson"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2023, 4:54 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.The recent ruling in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
In an ironic twist, the Times v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Thompson, 20 F.4th 10 (C.A.D.C. 2021) (joined unanimous D.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:21 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the per curiam opinion this term in Thompson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Thompson Bayliss, Abrams & Bayliss LLP.Raul Piombo, Movant, pro se.U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Coverage of the effect of the decision on the school-voucher debate comes from Carolyn Thompson at the Associated Press. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:05 am
Top Court Rules Litigation Finance Transaction Violates Champerty Doctrine” [Kevin LaCroix, Alison Frankel on Justinian Capital SPC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
Torres-Perez. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
., Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLP On December 15, 2014, in Heien v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
The anniversaries of Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:14 am
He told Torres he was an FBI agent and said he was looking into a laptop that had been returned to the school; Torres said the school redistributed returned laptops to new students. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Thompson, 2012 IL App (3d) 100188. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm
V. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Thompson (W.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 13, 2008 Torres v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to assign defendant,… [read post]
