Search for: "Turner v. Peters" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:31 am
.), on Friday, March 6, 2020 Tags: Extraterritoriality, Foreign issuers, International governance, Liability standards, Morrison v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm by Aaron Moss
A Cabin in the Woods In 2007, Peter Gallagher (an author, not the dad on “The O.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
McDonagh, Paris court grants an SEP anti-anti-suit injunction in IPCom v Lenovo: a worrying decision in uncertain times? [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
David Woods, Chief Marketing Officer, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP Maria Zagalis, Associate Director of Business Development, Arent Fox LLP Peter Zeughauser, Chairman, Zeughauser Group Andrew Zolli, Z+ Partners [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
A recent illustration is Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 296 (QB), a libel claim brought by a social worker who had had some responsibility for “Baby P”, Peter Connelly, during his lifetime. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]