Search for: "U. S. A. C. Transport, Inc. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm by WIMS
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm by Will Aitchison
RydbomExp., Inc., 2009 WL 3152136 *6 (E.D.Pa., September 30, 2009); Tidd v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Set aside for now whether such a mandate is good policy, whether it's consistent with the First Amendment, and whether it's consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause.[1] Is such a state law preempted by § 230(c)(2)? [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
Resource Investments, Inc. and Land Recovery, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, United States Supreme Court (1/13/15)Criminal LawWhitfield, fleeing a botched bank robbery, entered 79-year-old Parnell’s home and guided her from a hallway to a room a few feet away, where she suffered a fatal heart attack. [read post]