Search for: "U. S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS" Results 81 - 100 of 3,935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 7:09 pm by Steven Koprince
Court of Federal Claims, which dismissed the protest on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:10 am by Mark J. Levin and Steven W. Suflas
Saxon, the Court held that the plaintiff’s claims were exempt from arbitration under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which exempts from the statute’s ambit “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Alyssa N. Lankford, McAfee & Taft
Women’s National Soccer Team (WNT) filed a collective and class action lawsuit in federal court against the United States Soccer Federation, Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Alyssa N. Lankford, McAfee & Taft
Women’s National Soccer Team (WNT) filed a collective and class action lawsuit in federal court against the United States Soccer Federation, Inc. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:13 pm by Donald Maurice
In a 5-3 decision handed down on May 15, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is not violated when a debt collector files a proof of claim for a debt subject to the bar of an expired limitations period. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:06 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
., the Federal Circuit reversed the district courts claim construction that underlay its finding of indefiniteness, which was vacated. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:19 am by Steven Koprince
A procuring agency’s conduct in the course of evaluating proposals–and defending itself in four subsequent bid protests–was an “egregious example of intransigence and deception,” according to the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Women’s National Soccer Team (WNT) sued the United States Soccer Federation in federal court in California. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:14 pm by James W. Ward
Specifically, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts California Supreme Court case law that precluded division of PAGA actions into individual and non-individual claims through an arbitration agreement. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:38 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Even though U-Haul was not seeking to preclude the PAGA cause of action but only to arbitrate the individual issues determinative of plaintiffs’ standing for their PAGA claims, the Court of Appeal rejected U-Haul’s argument. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:06 pm by Anthony Lake
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals denied Bond's claims, holding that Bond lacked "standing" to object to the statute based upon the Tenth Amendment or Federalism (the division of powers between the Federal government and the States) because no State was involved in Bond's Federal prosecution. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:52 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Curver then appealed to the CAFC which affirmed the District Courts decision that the claim language limited the scope of the claimed design to apply to chairs only. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:09 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
In a 7-2 decision today, the Supreme Court held that MacLean’s actions did not violate any federal law, just TSA regulations. [read post]