Search for: "U. S. v. Floyd" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
China Economic and Security Review Commission  was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Floyd Abrams, New York City, for respondents. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
In this clip, Judge Floyd asks “if there is anything other than willful blindness that would prevent us from getting behind those statements. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Boxer Floyd Mayweather’s ex-fiancee’s defamation claim against him has been dismissed by a California appeals court. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:44 am by Eugene Volokh
[U]nder the Roberts Court, a new category of unprotected speech has quietly been added to the historic list of First Amendment “exceptions” recognized in Chaplinsky v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Floyd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Now we have yet another group of capital cases from the Gulf Coast that look like potential GVR candidates that instead keep getting relisted: Floyd v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
  During Jones’s stay in the Third Circuit, the Court held in Welch v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division awarded the City damages in the amount of $316,535.54 and declared that the City was relieved of its obligation to provide Whalen health insurance benefits earned through his employment.* See William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 61 AD3d 856.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_04289.htm [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
You warm up to them easily hahah but can't talk to a guy that uve known for 7 years ... and were in a relationship and wanted to marry and start a family with ....again u said the above text that's why I'm say in this to you ....jus hurts that u ignore.Patel: YES! [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am by Legal Talk Network
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:09 am by Justin P. Webb
We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by Steve McConnell
You know things are going well when the court begins its analysis by by observing that it's "[u]nclear … where Dr. [read post]