Search for: "U. S. v. Garrett"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Chrostek, Garrett. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
[MetTel] v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 am
Neil v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Schmidlin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
64 U. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
The Defendants in Craig McLachlan’s defamation case have alleged that the actor touched a colleague’s breast during a rehearsal for Neighbours in the 1980s during a preliminary hearing. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Broekman: Telling Boxes—Towards a Kevelson Archive12.30 – 14.00: Lunch in the Katz Hall14.00 – 14.45: Larry Catà Backer: Legal Semiotics and Political Practice: The Semiotics of a One-Party System14.45 – 15.30: Meghann Garrett: From Intellectual Property Attorney to In-House Council—A Change in Perspective15.30 – 15.45: Tea/Coffee Break15.45 – 16.45: Alan C. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
After the jump are the panels sponsored by the Law and History CRN a next week's annual meeting in Mexico City. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Improvements to the IRS’s technological infrastructure could reduce the tax gap while not creating new burdens for taxpayers. [read post]
