Search for: "U. S. v. Hardy" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[11] But that's not a problem here: The main risk of reputational damage comes when people simply search for R.R.'s name, or ask about what he had been accused of, [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Stevens v Wheeler  2022 NY Slip Op 31699(U) April 27, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 151129/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:55 am
That's only for the hardy amongst y'all. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
If the plaintiff’s alleged injury had been asbestosis, the employer’s knowledge should have sufficed. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
We had a guest post in this blog providing a descriptive comment on the decision of the two judge Bench in Union of India v Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc (2018: SCI)("Hardy I") referring the matter to a larger Bench of the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Australia In the case of Hardie v Herald and Weekly Times [2016] VSCA 103, the Court of Appeal of Victoria dismissed an appeal on liability in respect of an allegation that the plaintiff was a brothel madam and increased the damages from Aus$90,000 to $250,000. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
  Wattaccurately states that “[u]nder the learned intermediary doctrine, however, a prescribing physician may bear all of the responsibility when a consumer is given an inadequate warning about a drug, even when a manufacturer played some role in making that warning insufficient. [read post]