Search for: "U. S. v. Jury"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Criminal sanctions Facts determing amount Question for jury Opinion: pdf html [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 7:19 am
s verdict under Brecht v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
Quon decided; city’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:48 am
Friedman, Quazzo v Quazzo, 2020 NY Slip Op 32342(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 17, 2020], highlights some of the reasons few business divorce cases wind up before juries. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:15 am
S. ___ (2012) (per curiam); Bobby v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm
DOJ News Release: “The Department of Justice announced that a grand jury in the District of Columbia today returned an indictment presented by the Special Counsel’s Office. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
Missouri, 439 U. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:48 am
This case, LBI, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
Epistemic Crimes In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am
S. 220, 230–232 (2005); Apprendi v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 2:30 am
Title 18 U. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
Georgia, 601 U. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Animal Science Products, Inc v Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co, 585 U. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 10:20 am
Davis, 580 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
While this is an interesting case about the protection of speech advocating jury nullification, what is even more interesting is the story behind it [...] [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
Read the state’s complete petition here, and Hand’s brief in opposition here. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:49 am
Translogic v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:23 am
Lane, 489 U. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
It's true you don't get a U-visa for endangerment charges, but still, a jury might find the (alleged) change of story relevant and material.Again, the standard is abuse of discretion, so you're going to have a hard time arguing that a trial court made the wrong "403" call on relevance versus prejudice. [read post]
