Search for: "U. S. v. London" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  Prior to joining Hunton & Williams, Paul was a policy researcher at a think tank based at the London School of Economics, where he helped to develop a network of policymakers, academics, and lobby groups collaborating in areas involving consumer protection and digital rights. 1See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 52(4).2Id. at Section 57.3Id. at Section 70.4See A v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
Kiara graduated from the Law Tripos at the University of Cambridge in 2021 (St John’s College). [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:53 am by Pete Black
" http://j.mp/clS72R wired's threat level blog on city of ontario v quon ... [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
UPONOR Minn2013http://t.co/T61hjeeHwT -> Joinder in BitTorrent copyright claim ok, TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Tangible IP) Global IP law: Two recent publications ‘Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights’ by R Bird and S C Jain and ‘Global Intellectual Property Law’ by G Dutfield and U Suthersanen (IPKat)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands What price brands on the balance sheet? [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
See Spartan Steel v Martin & Co [1973] 1 QB 27, 37; Lamb v Camden London Borough Council [1981] 1 QB 625, 634, 636–637. 2 See A. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
  An order for access was made by HHJ Luba QC in the Central London County Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media In the case of UFC-Que Choisir v Google (Judgment in French) the TGI Paris has ruled that 38 of the clauses in Google’s “Terms of use” and “Confidentiality Policy” were unfair and hence null and void. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection London company Pension House Exchange (PHE) has been fined £45,000 for making more than 39,000 nuisance calls to people about their pensions. [read post]