Search for: "U. S. v. May" Results 1 - 20 of 7,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 2:15 am by tracey
Regina v D (N); Regina v P (A); Regina v U (S) [2011] WLR (D)  166 “Evidence that a defendant had viewed child pornography was capable of being adduced in evidence at trial under section 101(1)(d) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to demonstrate a propensity for offences involving the sexual abuse of children. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Hearsay testimony may be admitted in evidence in an administrative hearingDemas v City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 03267, Appellate Division, First DepartmentA coach [Coach] of a school basketball team filed an Article 78 petition challenging the unsatisfactory performance rating (U-Rating) he received for the 2012-2013 school year. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
Courts thus may not create 'implied safe harbors.'" Slip op. at 6 (citing Krumme v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 48, 49, 57 (1964) (corporate tax records); McPhaul v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:29 pm
An emergency vehicle operator may not assert Vehicle and Traffic Law §1104’s “protection from liability” where the operator is the plaintiffAyers v O'Brien, 2009 NY Slip Op 09313, Decided on December 17, 2009, Court of AppealsMarc A. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 10:15 am by Dunstan Barnes
This case may prove to be the most significant Supreme Court fair use case to date. [read post]