Search for: "U. S. v. Mccoy" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
What is important is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301, 755 NYS2d 693 [2002]). [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This is true even where the plaintiff is unaware of any malpractice, damages, or injury (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 300- 301). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Jackson, 17-651, McCoy v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:20 am
The Court issued two opinions with today’s order list, the long-discussed case Perry Homes v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Moncho v Miller  2020 NY Slip Op 31821(U)  June 12, 2020  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 155382/2017  Judge: W. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Retail Fish Inc. v Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C. 2018 NY Slip Op 30276(U) February 16, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151002/15 Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
McCoy, which was issued on January 24, 2011, and Auer v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The post included the full address and a photo of Casey’s home, which is also where he works, causing him to fear for his family’s safety. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
 A party will not be heard to complain, or attack its adversary, about failure to produce materials never requested.[13] Citing Rule 26(a) and its subsections, which deal with the report, and not discovery beyond the report, several cases take a narrow view of disclosure as embodied in the report requirement.[14] In one case, McCoy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
's interpretation was “not contrary to any express Congressional intent. [read post]