Search for: "U. S. v. Montgomery" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 10:35 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Apr. 15 Conference)   Serial relists raising Montgomery v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Arizona 15-8842Issue: (1) Whether a sentencing judge's exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am by John Elwood
  Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Arizona 15-8842 Issues: (1) Whether a sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am by John Elwood
  Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm by David Kopel
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:15 pm
For years before the Pac-10 added one (I think it was 2002), Stanford's Mike Montgomery and Arizona's Lute Olson fought it tooth and nail. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:22 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Los prestatarios FHA pueden calificar para el Reclamo Parcial Independiente para Desastres actualizado si cumplen las siguientes condiciones: Viven dentro de los límites geográficos del área con declaración presidencial de desastre en Puerto Rico y las Islas Vírgenes de EEUU; Su capacidad de hacer los pagos hipotecarios está directa o sustancialmente afectada por el desastre; Su hipoteca no estaba atrasada en más de 60 días… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
As forecast, a tangle of last week’s relists were GVR’d in light of Montgomery v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
” They all involve the same issue as Montgomery v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
During oral arguments, the Court spent most of its time discussing whether it has jurisdiction to decide Montgomery v. [read post]