Search for: "U. S. v. Rodriguez" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” These allegations fail to specify “ascertainable damages,” Rudolph at 443, and it is no more than “an insufficient speculation” (Rodriguez v Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P,C., 81 AD3d 551, 557 [1st Dept 2011]) that Carter, who had failed to pay his New York counsel, and then failed to pay a settlement of that counsel’s claim, would have prevailed in that counsel’s subsequent suit. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 6:41 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Además, alegó que la Regla 10.7 de Procedimiento Civil no aplica a esta controversia, pues esta regula únicamente las defensas y objeciones “que sean de las que la Regla 10 permite presentar mediante moción”. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1185–86, [3d Dept 2015].) [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]