Search for: "U. S. v. Russo" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Russo (USSC, 29 June 2020) will readily appreciate the ongoing—and perhaps increasing—importance of that insight. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
De ahí en adelante, se fundarían comités de acción política (súper PAC) con el fin de influi [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm by Michael DelSignore
The Louisiana law at issue in this case is virtually identical to the Texas law that was struck down by the Court in Whole Women’s Health v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack  2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U)  Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County  Reed, J.. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
If the plaintiff’s alleged injury had been asbestosis, the employer’s knowledge should have sufficed. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Magid was a significant step forward from prior appellate law on the subject of deadlock under Section 63, the most recent of which, Seligson v Russo, 16 AD3d 253 [1st Dept 2005], involved true “50-50 deadlock. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am by Peter Mahler
In Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the lower court’s denial of the respondent shareholder’s request for permission to file an untimely election made eight years after the dissolution proceeding’s commencement. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:44 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
After a lengthy interlude, along comes Magid v Magid, 2017 NY Slip Op 32603(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 14, 2017]. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
Matter of Smith v Russo, 230 AD2d 863 [2d Dept 1996]; Matter of Chu v Sino Chemists, 192 AD2d 315 [1st Dept 1993]), and the nature and extent of any intervening changes to the business and/or its value certainly could be considered. [read post]