Search for: "U. S. v. Schwartz" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” If an operating agreement contains the word “shall” in the context of advancement or indemnification, the right generally should be considered “mandatory” (Comer v Krolick, 2015 NY Slip Op 32274(U) [Sup Ct NY County Dec. 2, 2015]). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Local JOO AFL-CIO v Schwartz, 32 AD3d 710, 713 [1st Dept 2006] (internal quotations omitted).) [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
If the plaintiff’s alleged injury had been asbestosis, the employer’s knowledge should have sufficed. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Freedom of Expression in Asia, Forthcoming, Lau, Law and Schwartz (eds), Oxford Handbook of Constitutional Law in Asia, Oxford University Press, U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 820 (2019), Adrienne Stone, University of Melbourne – Law School. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 In Saucedo v Pierangelo  2018 NY Slip Op 31750(U)  July 24, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 160330/2016 Judge William Franc Perry explains judicial immunity for a “parenting coordinator. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:29 am by Brian Corrigan
This blog post discusses Schwartz v Bourque, 2017 NY Slip Op 31621(U) (Sur Ct, Nassau County June 14, 2017), a recent decision involving an agreement to make a testamentary disposition as to a specific parcel of real property, a later agreement between the same parties concerning that property (that was alleged to have superseded the earlier agreement), and a deed transferring that same property which was contrary to the terms of the earlier agreement, but not the later… [read post]