Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers"
Results 61 - 80
of 241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Not only would they be the seller/tenant in the transaction, but also the secured lender. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 3:52 pm
Today's decision of the Alabama Supreme Court in Young Americans for Liberty v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
U. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:58 am
Said the District Court: The clear underlying rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
S. 303, 309 (1980); Le Roy v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:11 am
Sila Luis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am
.' Hernandez v Marquez 2012 NY Slip Op 31112(U) April 20, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 103531/11 Judge: Joan A. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
South Dakota’s law required an out-of-state seller to collect and remit use tax as if the seller had an in-state physical presence if the seller, on an annual basis, either delivered more than $100,000 of goods or services into the state or engaged in 200 or more transactions for the delivery of goods or services into the state.[7] South Dakota’s law was tailored to foreclose the possibility of retroactive application and to… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,481.Franchisor’s “Physical Presence” Not Needed for Income Taxation in IowaThe essence of the much-discussed recent decision in KFC Corporation v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
S. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:09 am
CGS Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court Records and Briefs (November 18, 2010)(Christine Sellers) [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
This post explores the Third Circuit’s decision, Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
’” McMahon v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
The seller’s position was upheld in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
The OU kosher mark consists of a U within a circle. [read post]
