Search for: "U. S. v. United Technologies Corp" Results 61 - 80 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
Royalties can be considered from the standpoint of a hypothetical negotiation guided by the 15 factors listed in Georgia-Pacific Corp v US Plywood Corp, 318 F Supp 1116, 1120 (SDNY 1970). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
The protection of intellectual property is at the forefront of agreements between nation-states because of the relative ease of copying, and the lax attitude of some nation-states to prevent and punish infringement.[2] A prevailing argument is the thesis that "technology drives investment" and to the extent that technology is reluctant to flow where it is not protected, the lack of an adequate level of protection could stunt technological transfer and… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
MIT Technology Review has more information here. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
One of the kit’s components, Taq polymerase, is manufactured in the United States, and then shipped overseas to Life Technologies Corporation’s factory in the UK. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Stryker Corp (271 Patent Blog) CAFC: Court will not correct claim drafting error to avoid ‘absurdity’: Haemonetics, Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
United States, 444 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O)   US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]