Search for: "U. S. v. Whalen"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
’"* Clearly there was no dispute that Whalen’s admission to stealing more than $50,000 from the City over the course of a nearly six-year period constitutes conclusive proof of such facts and established the City's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Whalen's liability. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
S. 589 (1977), and Nixon v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:11 am
Selection of one of available alternative remedies provided by the State's Human Right Law bars recourse to the otherTierney v Patchogue Fire Dept. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
[Today's oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
Pedraza-Fariña & Ryan Whalen, A Network Theory of Patentability, 87 U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills, 2007 NY Slip Op 52616(U), Decided on August 10, 2007, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Judge Robert M. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Bell, Secrets and Lies: News Media and Law Enforcement Use of Deception as an Investigative Tool, 60 U. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:20 am
End Note: The two cases referenced at the start are Whalen v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:17 am
S., at 598–599; Whalen, 429 U. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Chapter Readings· U. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
" U. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
If you remember how credit default swaps, then you already understand what that posting of additional collateral means… if you don’t, however, then perhaps you could use a refresher course at Mandelman U, where complexity we eschew… lol. [read post]
