Search for: "U.S. Bank National Association v. M" Results 61 - 80 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am by Marissa Miller
National Australia Bank, in which the Court held that U.S. securities laws do not apply to investment deals that occur outside the country, even if they have a domestic impact or effect. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:59 pm
One of these decisions was a case called Nobelman v. [read post]
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Trask
National Australia Bank Ltd., which held that a securities plaintiff with no connection to the United States may not avail itself of the U.S. court system; and Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 7:01 am by Sara Bjerg Moller
As part of a book I’m writing on wartime coalitions, I’ve interviewed more than four dozen former senior U.S. and NATO military and political officials, including SACEURs, undersecretaries of defense, deputy assistant secretaries, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, CENTCOM, the NATO Military Committee and national chiefs of defense. [read post]