Search for: "U.S. Shoe Corp v. Brown Group"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
Benguet (1952), International Shoe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:17 am
Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
And, in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
And, in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Id. at 21-22 (discussing factors for identifying "submarkets" under Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Miles case, the Court held that resale minimum price fixing was illegal per se under Section 1.[11] It found horizontal price-fixing agreements to be per se illegal in Socony Vacuum.[12] Since Socony Vacuum, the Court has limited the application of per se illegality to bid rigging (a form of horizontal price fixing),[13] horizontal market divisions,[14] tying,[15] and group boycotts[16]. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm
Cir. 2006); Sandt, 264 F.3d at1350–51; Finnigan Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
And in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
The issues are similar to those in Ritz Hotel Ltd v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Grinnell Corp. (1966) and Brown Shoe Company Inc. v. [read post]
