Search for: "U.S. v. Amos*" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Pribetic for bringing to light the case of the day, Third Point LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
Gelman does not report what diseases were involved in the 17 claims, arising out of the Paterson factory that used mostly amosite asbestos from South Africa. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997)(questioning the external validity of a study of massive injected doses of PCBs in baby mice, with an outcome unrelated to the cancer claimed by paintiff) 1st Circuit Sutera v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
While it has been reported that there may be an enhanced prevalence of pulmonary neoplasia in some asbestos industries (e.g. crocidolite or amosite), or in some locations (e.g. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
During his years of employment, Owens-Corning had used both chrysotile and amosite in manufacturing Kaylo. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
  Representatives in the U.S. are the North American Asbestos Corporation. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Supported by Selikoff’s report, UNARCO worker Anton Szczesniak settled his worker’s compensation case, involving “intestinal cancer,” for $2,000 in 1952.26 Selikoff published data on the carcinogenicity of amosite in 1972,27 a delay of twenty years.28 1952. [read post]