Search for: "U.S. v. Bergeron*"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm
The Court of Appeals then noted that, as established by its precedent in Friolo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm
Steven Agee, in Lund v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
The panel of the Court of Appeals cited the Supreme Court's decision in Blanchard v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
, 559 U.S. 542, 552 (2010); Saizan v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 10:27 am
These factors include those set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
See Dulong v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:49 am
” “We pointed out that we had not seen such a holding in the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
In one of a series of rulings in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
” Mitts v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 4:48 am
BLANCHARD v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
As Justice Hecht notes in his concurrence, the majority opinion was not framed in jurisdictional absolutes: “‘we, like the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:51 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 5:49 am
”[5] Under NAGPRA, museums were required to repatriate applicable human remains and cultural items upon the request of a tribe, with the statute laying out a process for inventorying items and working with tribes.[6] At the time, the government estimated that it would take about a decade to complete this repatriation.[7] However, over three decades later, over 110,000 Native American remains were still unrepatriated as of 2023, with scholars estimating it to take anywhere from 70 to over 200… [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
” 26 U.S. [read post]
