Search for: "U.S. v. Brady*" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2009, 5:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The Court's holding in Vilardi means what it says: Harmless error anaylsis will not save convictions, even convictions for serious crimes, where there is a reasonable possibility that Brady violations (Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 [1963]) affected the jury's verdict. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC affirmed the district court (SD Fl) holding of inequitable conductagainst Apotex as to the prosecution of US '556 in Apotex v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm by anbrandon
  The opinion notes that "[t]his particular case is not close," and recommends "that the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm by Jon Sands
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Napue v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:34 am by Sean Wajert
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and its federal and state progeny. [read post]