Search for: "U.S. v. Catholic*" Results 61 - 78 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2010, 4:10 pm by tjsllibrary
Considerable emphasis is placed upon the twentieth century, especially the period since the 1972 Furman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm by Elin Hofverberg
You can read more about the meeting in 1527 in Reformationsriksdagen i Västerås by Harald Hjärne. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
During the Mississippi abortion case argued earlier this term, the attorney defending the prohibition invoked the case of Washington v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:29 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
"If you check the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life's recent U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
One group, led by former Attorneys General Janet Reno and Nicholas Katzenbach, stresses the decades during which their Department supported the view that the Amendment did not embrace a private, individual right — and notes that the Department put that argument before the Supreme Court when it last examined the Amendment’s meaning: U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
They had no interest in the Church's intolerant doctrines, which could not possibly be implemented in the U.S. anyway. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am by John Culhane
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Hence, as Justice O'Connor put it in her concurrence in McCreary County, Ky. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am by Clara Altman
The nineteenth-century Irish and German immigrants left their homelands to come to America, but according to Timothy Matovina “the first large group of Hispanic Catholics became part of the nation during that same era without ever leaving home, as they were incorporated into its boundaries during U.S. territorial expansion into Florida and then westward. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That, of course, was an idea central to the decision that the Supreme Court now has under review — the ruling by the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses Ed Whelan, President of the Ethic and Public Policy Center and a leading conservative voice on Supreme Court nominees. [read post]