Search for: "U.S. v. Erickson" Results 41 - 60 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The doctrine applies only to legal determinations that were necessarily resolved on the merits in [a] prior decision” and “to the same questions presented in the same case” (Erickson, 98 AD3d at 717; Baldasano v Bank of N.Y., 199 AD2d 184, 185 [2d Dept 1993]; see also U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Erickson and the 1982 ruling in Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:43 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[iv] The judge has the support of both of North Dakota’s U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am by mjpetro
Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 678, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); Pointer v. [read post]