Search for: "U.S. v. Mark R"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 6:56 am
Peter ReapThe Trademark Trail and Appeal Board erred in finding that there is no likelihood of confusion between Omaha Steaks International’s over two dozen registered marks, each containing the words “Omaha Steaks,” and Greater Omaha Packing Company’s applied for GREATER OMAHA PROVIDING THE HIGHEST QUALITY BEEF mark (the Opposed Mark), the U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
By Mark R. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
Crawford, a U.S. district court in Tennessee recently came to the same conclusion in Harbison v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am
Boldface Licensing & Branding, Inc., April 1, 2019, Goldberg, R.). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 2:42 pm
R. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:38 am
February 11, 2011), R&R 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:30 am
In Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
[www.markschwab.us]FILED U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
February 26, 2010), USMJ’s R&R, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
Mayer Brown’s Partner James R. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 2:03 pm
R. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:41 pm
By Joseph Herndon -- Zheng Cai DBA Tai Chi Green Tea Inc. appealed an opinion of the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm
Nicholas KasterThe Trademark Trial and Appeal Board did not err when it found that the WU DANG TAI CHI GREEN TEA mark was confusingly similar to the registered mark TAI CHI, according to the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
"Digesting the complaint, the Court found that plaintiff had pleaded that a Tombow product has been marked with U.S. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
Soltero, Carlos R. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am
In a non-precedential decision, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 5:56 am
Michael R. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Keith, Mark E. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm
Keith, Mark E. [read post]
