Search for: "U.S. v. Mccomb" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2023, 3:05 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
McComb, 331 U.S. 722 (1947), opaquely explained that the determination of whether a person is an employee, as opposed to an independent contractor, is based on the “underlying economic realities” as exposed by the “circumstances of the whole activity. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
McComb, 331 U.S. 722, 726 (1947), the Supreme Court held that meat boners in a factory were employees, even though the boners owned their own tools, hired employees to assist with the boning operation, and were not paid hourly. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
Chief Justice Recuses in New Wyeth Case The National Law Journal The Supreme Court on Monday announced it was granting review in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding [these remain outstanding]: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert heard, 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) Ames & anr v The Spamhaus Project Ltd, heard 12 December 2014 (Warby… [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
Pa., 418 U.S. 506, 5‐34 (1974) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting); Hanner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 20 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) gave judgment in the case of Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWCA Civ 121). [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Spence, Professor of Law, Politics & Regulation, University of Texas School of Law and McCombs School of Business—Corporate Social Responsibility in the Shale Patch? [read post]