Search for: "U.S. v. NEVADA & CALIFORNIA"
Results 121 - 140
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
In Haight v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:47 am
Maryland Court of Appeals 132 U.S. 1327 (March 20, 2012), contrast it with the Supreme Court's prior holding in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:12 am
LEXIS 140901 (D NV, Sept 30, 2013), a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 1:05 pm
In Fairwell v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 6:02 am
The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
Nevada Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court rejected most of that challenge, and the case then went on to the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 9:49 am
Nevada, 2010 U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
LEXIS 134830 (D NV, Sept. 19, 2013) a Nevada federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2013 U.S. [read post]
21 May 2020, 12:15 pm
In our case, Alasaad v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
Some states, such as California, Nevada, New Jersey and Vermont, announced plans to send mail-in ballots to all registered voters. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:41 am
The case, Rizo v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:41 am
The case, Rizo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 8:36 am
LEXIS 39682 (ED CA, March 25, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Native American inmate be allowed to move ahead with his complaints regarding denial of access to a sweat lodge, to a spiritual advisor and to religious property.In Seagraves v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
