Search for: "U.S. v. Strickland"
Results 61 - 80
of 559
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
That Court, agreeing with other Courts in Texas and around the country, held that Padilla does not apply new rule of criminal procedure but is an extension of the rule in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:58 am
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 12:54 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 659 (1984)]. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:01 pm
” Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Also, the panel questioned prior circuit precedent holding that Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 6:02 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:16 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:37 pm
Ogle, 2008 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 11:57 pm
To analyze whether the ineffective assistance rises to a Sixth Amendment violation, courts must follow a two-part test set out in Strickland v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:00 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:59 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
" Wright v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Beard, 545 U.S. 374, 387 (2005) (same). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
26 Aug 2004, 9:12 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687; Ardolino v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:07 pm
" Kimmelman, 477 U.S. at 381; see also Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687-88. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
They recognized that the test for what's considered ineffective assistance of counsel is not new (Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Strickland v. [read post]
