Search for: "U.S. v. Teague"
Results 81 - 100
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 8:32 pm
Falcon also argued that the rule from Teague v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
In the federal courts, the question of retroactivity is decided under what’s called the Teague test (so named for the seminal U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Wyeth LLC, U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
Second, the precedent, pre-Padilla, supporting the application of Strickland in this context is insufficient to satisfy Teague v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Lake, et al., No. 12-6137, 2013 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
The District Courts were left to determine the answer, and many reached different results using the “new rule” principles of Teague v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
The fundamental spirit of Teague v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 2:33 pm
Commonwealth of Kentucky 559 U.S. _____, does not apply retroactively under the Teague Rule 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
The Justices of the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:03 am
” In a recent decision, U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
Teague, 111 S.W.3d 742 (Texas Court of Appeals 2003). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
" Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” Id. at *4; citing Teague v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
” Among these are the retroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:09 am
First off, the Fifth Circuit U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:00 pm
The case is Figuereo-Sanchez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:21 pm
The Court applied the federal analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
