Search for: "UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC"
Results 161 - 180
of 406
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:15 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., March 25, 2015, U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:58 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. and its impact on low-wage immigrant and Latina workers. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
(c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:58 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., wherein the Court vacated the Fourth Circuit’s decision to affirm UPS’s successful motion for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., March 25, 2015, Breyer, S.). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. suggested that the answer is yes. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. was whether an employer must provide the same work accommodations to a pregnant employee as provided to similarly situated, non-pregnant employees. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:03 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: The European Commission has published a detailed summary of its prohibition of the intended merger of United Parcel Service Inc. and TNT Express, based... [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
United Parcel Service, the Court will decide whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer that accommodates non-pregnant employees with work limitations to accommodate pregnant employees who have similar limitations. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:43 am
The solicitation instructed that proposals deemed untimely would not be considered and that “[d]elays caused by commercial means such as airlines, express carriers such as Federal Express, United Parcel Service, etc or municipal difficulties such as black-outs, are not excusable. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Forest City Enterprises, Inc.,[2] 426 U.S. 668 (1976) (due process limitations)· K.K. [read post]
