Search for: "US Gypsum Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
Abatement companies have also faced fines and penalties for using untrained and unprotected crews to quickly and cheaply remove asbestos, which increases exposure risk of building occupants, in addition to the obvious risks faced by the unprotected and often unsuspecting workers. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 11:06 pm
First, do you suppose United States Gypsum Company views the lime green color of its gypsum panels to be a trademark? [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:36 am
This change from the old ‘fair basis’ provision was intended to align Australian patent law with that of the UK and Europe, requiring the disclosure to be commensurate with the scope of the claims, i.e. that the description should be sufficient to enable the skilled person to perform the invention across the full width of the claims.So far, there has been no judicial consideration of this new enablement requirement, and until recently there was just one Patent Office decision, CSR… [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 11:25 am
Other asbestos sites in Portsmouth are: Atlantic Corporation Eastern Oil and Rendering Company National Gypsum Plant New England Power Co. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 11:30 am
Justin Knopf, Farmer, Gypsum, KSMr. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 6:13 pm
See National Gypsum Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd.; No. 4:17-cv-02019 (D.S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:55 am
Grace & Corporation Armstrong World Industries Johns-Manville Celotex Corporation Fibreboard Corporation National Gypsum Corporation Flintkote Company Unarco Southwest Electric Power Company Throughout the past century, asbestos had been manufacturers' favorite material, with more than 3.000 products containing the mineral at the time. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Thorpe Kaiser Gypsum Company W R. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Despite the fact that evidence supporting a causal relation between exposure and pulmonary disease was undeniable and well-known by most asbestos companies by the mid-1930s, it took over four decades for the use of these carcinogenic minerals to be properly regulated. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:11 pm
Kaiser Gypsum Company is a former manufacturer of building products, including drywall, joint compounds and cements. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:16 pm
The three and half week long trial showed that Kaiser Gypsum, the manufacturer of a spackle-like product used on wallboard, exposed David Hoff to asbestos in the 1970s even though the company was aware of the hazard as early as 1965, according to evidence presented at the trial. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Kaiser Gypsum is no longer in business, but it used to make a host of building products, including joint compounds, cements and drywall. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
Gypsum Co. et al. 333 U.S. 364, 387-88 (1948). [read post]
Disclosure and Support in Australian Patent Specifications: Raised Bar Trips Applicant in Opposition
23 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm
Back in November 2015, the Australian Patent Office issued the first published decision to consider enhanced requirements for patent specifications that were introduced by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012: CSR Building Products Limited v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72.The decision arises from an opposition by CSR Building Products Limited to the grant of a patent on an application by United States Gypsum Company. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
As a result, “fault” in s.1(1) of the Act is being used in two different senses. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Gasguzzlers ‘R Us didn’t get its federal bailout and goes bankrupt. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:52 am
Financial Statements in Support of an Original Listing Application The Staff Notice also provides guidance with respect to the use of audited forecast financial statements, pro forma financial statements and acceptable accounting standards in an application for listing. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
United States Gypsum Company had reached the opposite conclusion, holding that plaintiff only had to prove that he or she was treated differently because of gender and that proof of sexual motivation was unnecessary. [read post]
