Search for: "US Inventor" Results 101 - 120 of 8,226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Inventor and entrepreneur Sir James Dyson (the “Claimant”) sued MGN Limited, owner of the Daily Mirror newspaper, (the “Defendant”). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
If you recall, the ITC overarching mission is to protect US industry from unfair foreign competition. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Where an inventor can trace the origin of the divisional back to a direction of the Commissioner, it will be immune from double patenting attacks. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:14 pm by bklemm@foley.com
” The Wands Factors As a refresher, the Guidelines summarize the Wands factors, which are discussed in more detail in MPEP 2164.01(a): the breadth of the invention; the nature of the invention; the state of the prior art; the level of one of ordinary skill; the level of predictability in the art; the amount of direction provided by the inventor; the existence of working examples; and the quantity of experimentation needed to make and use the… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
In exchange for the monopoly period, the inventor ensures the public will know how to freely use the invention when the patent expires. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Three amicus briefs, by US Inventor, Centripetal Networks, and Ron Katznelson support these arguments. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by WIRED
Satoshi Nakamoto, the cryptocurrency’s mysterious and unidentifiable inventor, had stated in an email introducing Bitcoin that “participants can be anonymous. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:10 am by heidi8
 Do buy into the Supreme Court’s ruling that inventors and users cannot be liable for infringement for creating, distributing or using a device, program or item that is capable of non-infringing uses. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
The UKIPO has also picked up on these issues, stating “There is no evidence that UK patent law is currently inappropriate to protect inventions made using AI. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
  At the close of 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its eagerly awaited and widely publicized judgment in Thaler v Comptroller-General confirming that a patent application may not name an AI machine as an inventor. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
  There was a report of the case on Stuff And three “bonus” cases from the US: US Dominion, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:45 am by Tristan Marot
As noted by the Court, it “has never been Dr Thaler’s case that he was the inventor and used DABUS as a highly sophisticated tool. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm by Holly
To learn more about Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig and how we assist you, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:15 am by Stewart Baker
Jeffery Atik and I lead off the episode by covering recent AI legal developments that simply underscore the obvious: AI engines can't get patents as "inventors. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:06 am by Dennis Crouch
Salix argues this means the press release reflects the inventor’s own work, not the work of “others,” and thus does not qualify as prior art that can be used against the patents. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:37 am by Dennis Crouch
When EL filed his patent application, he named himself as the sole inventor. [read post]