Search for: "US v. Blackwell" Results 101 - 120 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2008, 3:04 pm
  There is, BTW, an interesting case in Michigan that is going to test the limits of the ability of students to copy: Blackwell v Miller. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:05 pm
Bhartrihari: A Study of Vākyapadīya in the Light of Ancient Commentaries. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:16 pm by Beth Simone Noveck
  Two years ago, the Sixth Circuit in Stewart v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:27 am
Logsdon, 1988 US Dist Lexis 16864 (WD KY 1988); NBS v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:40 pm by Bexis
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:44 am by Bexis
The following post was sent to us by Brendan Kenny of Blackwell Burke. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:57 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
App. 2004] (Nixon does not preclude common-law claim), Reserve Solutions, Inc. v Vernaglia, 438 F Supp 2d 280 [SDNY 2006] (same), and Nightingale & Associates v Hopkins, 2008 US Dist LEXIS 90204 [DNJ Nov. 5, 2008] (Nixon precludes common-law claim). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am by Schachtman
Blackwell & Ariadna Forray, “Antidepressant Use in Pregnant and Postpartum Women,” 10 Ann. [read post]