Search for: "US v. Boardman" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Boardman Co., 11 A.3d 924 (Pa. 2011)(Pennsylvania Supreme Court acknowledged that “foundational problems” existed in Pennsylvania products liability law based upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 8:49 am
Michelle Boardman in her article March 2006 article in the University of Michigan (Go Blue!) [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
  With regards to design defect claims, since approximately 1984, the Pennsylvania courts have used a risk-utility analysis to initially determine, as a matter of law, whether a product may be considered by the jury to be defective. [read post]
For example, when the Ninth Circuit granted an injunction to stop the acquisition of a seafood processing company in the 2016 case Boardman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
It is an established principle of law, restated by the House of Lords in Boardman v Phipps (1967), that the relevant question to ask is whether ‘the reasonable man’ (a common benchmark in legal tests), looking at the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case, would think that there was a ‘real sensible possibility’ of conflict (known as the ‘conflict of interest rule’). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Josh Blackman
Davis held that a criminal penalty for using a firearm during a "crime of violence" was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Law Society has issued guidance to lawyers using social media services, including Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Boardman Co., 11 A. 3d 924 (Pa. 2011)(“the present status quo in Pennsylvania entails the continued application of Section 402A of the Restatement Second”) Beard v. [read post]