Search for: "US v. Charles T. Turner" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm by Judith G. McMullen
This week, the US Supreme Court handed down a decision in Turner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
In M A Lloyd & Sons Ltd (t/a KPM Marine) v PPC International Ltd (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2014] EWHC 41 (QB), ‘Charles Henry’, for the Claimant, had failed to file a witness statement by the date ordered, or indeed at all, (though a ‘curious document’ was served). [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:56 am by Giles Peaker
In M A Lloyd & Sons Ltd (t/a KPM Marine) v PPC International Ltd (t/a Professional Powercraft) [2014] EWHC 41 (QB), ‘Charles Henry’, for the Claimant, had failed to file a witness statement by the date ordered, or indeed at all, (though a ‘curious document’ was served). [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am by John Elwood
  James was relisted this week along with eleven of its closest friends: Turner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
I remember that she asked to talk to me, but I said I had already published an account of my experiences as a Turner Prize juror which she was welcome to quote, but I didn’t want to add to. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Zoe Tillman
" Reached by phone today, solo practitioner Jenifer Wicks, who represented petitioner Charles Turner, said she was still reading the opinion but would appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:57 am by Rob Robinson
Turner: An eDiscovery Battle with No Winners - http://tinyurl.com/2768hml (Venkat Rangan) Not All eDiscovery Productions Are Musicals - http://tinyurl.com/22umget (Josh Gilliland) Pondering eDiscovery Without Those Pesky Humans - http://tinyurl.com/2b7jotf (Eric Lipman) Prove Data Retention Law's Usefulness or Repeal It, says EU Privacy Chief - http://tinyurl.com/2bggzwc (Pinsent Masons) Regulatory Compliance: Are You Affected? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
Woodward, and authorizing the taking of a corporate franchise giving exclusive rights to cross a river for public use); Thorpe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
The Media Reform Coalition argues that the clauses are crucial: “Without a requirement to show damage, there is a danger that companies can use libel courts as an arm of their PR operations, simply suppressing what they don’t want in the public sphere“. [read post]