Search for: "US v. Christopher Bell" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 6:34 am by Christopher Markus
  The Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals’ decision in Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am by Amanda Frost
The Court recently granted cert. in Christopher v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
Two of the important scholars before me are Bernard Bell and Matt Herder.How I personally came to the conclusion that the Trade Secrets Act permits some disclosure of trade secrets by federal agencies is through my clinical work. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 1:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See CHRISTOPHER BEAUCHAMP,INVENTED BY LAW: ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL AND THE PATENT THATCHANGED AMERICA 58-85 (2014) (recounting many prior and existing usesof electrical currents in telegraphic communication before Bell’s invention).The conclusion of the brief:Amici urge this Court to affirm the district court’s decision thatAppellee’s claims directed to the use of a GUI are patentable subject matterunder § 101. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
University of Minnesota Suspension for Facebook/YouTube Rap Video Critical of High School Coach Does not Violate First Amendment – Bell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 5:34 pm by Mary Whisner
If you find a model answer to a Civil Procedure exam from 1994, don't be surprised if it doesn't mention  Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
More here.A Radiohead reference hooks us every time. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:38 am
The use of Drones by Law Enforcement: Joseph Hartshorne, Commander, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – Homeland Security Division Christopher Dunn, Captain, Ventura County Sheriff’s Office Jessica Farris, Policy and Advocacy Counsel, ACLU of Southern California V. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:45 am
Judge Bell presided over the trial. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:00 am by Christopher Sagers
Colleen McMahon, The Law of Unintended Consequences: Shockwaves in the Lower Courts After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]