Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 81 - 100
of 50,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 9:59 pm
Given that the... [read post]
22 May 2007, 10:03 am
US v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 7:27 pm
Given that there are only a few of us blogging regularly on these issues, seems to me the least the Court could have done is coordinate the release of its opinion in MetLife v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
Jordache" trademark for blue jeans was not infringed by manufacturer that identified its blue jeans for larger women with smiling pig and word "Lardashe" on seat of pants; striking dissimilarities in designs used in marks greatly outweighed any similarities, manufacturer intended to parody but that intent was not to confuse the public, and survey given by trademark owner did not demonstrate actual confusion.Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:37 pm
Sullivan d/b/a Survivor v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:39 am
US v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:43 pm
A district court's 113-page analysis in a case the federal government believed was extraordinary enough to pursue is entitled to greater deference, especially given the irreparable harm to the pregnant women of Texas. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:16 am
US v. [read post]
ALERT: CHANGE IN LAW – RETALIATION PROTECTION NOW GIVEN TO EMPLOYEES COMPLAINING OF KNOWN VIOLATIONS
25 May 2023, 1:40 pm
Garcia-Brower v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
The Court of Appeal nevertheless allowed Regeneron's submissions, given that the evidence was not extensive and was primarily given by Kymab's experts. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:23 pm
We were able to show that the use of force was excessive, and the State agreed to dismiss the felony Resisting Arrest charge, and agree to reduce the Extreme DUI to a first offense regular DUI with 1 day in jail (opposed to the 45 days now given for Super Extreme DUI’s). [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:41 am
Some of you may remember Wolf v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:35 pm
By Scott Kalish In Tracey v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
Given that there were no issues of fact to preclude the entry of summary judgment, the court in Conti applied the regular use exclusion and entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier and against the Plaintiff. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 3:45 am
Using an employee personnel files to determine an appropriate disciplinary penalty Bigelow v Trustees of the Village of Gouverneur, 63 NY2d 470 Perhaps the leading case concerning the use of an employee's personnel records in disciplinary procedures is the Court of Appeals’ decision in Bigelow v Trustees of the Village of Gouverneur In Bigelow, the Court of Appeals held that if a civil service employee is found guilty of misconduct, a public employer… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
I suppose that is not surprising, given the Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:15 am
In Bradley v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 9:54 am
Breitbart News Court Definitively Rejects AFP’s Argument That Posting a Photo to Twitter Grants AFP a License to Freely Use It — AFP v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
